Click here for the commentary track
In Tanuke’s longest movie review yet, TZ takes on the cinematic land mine that is: Disney’s The Shaggy Dog.
TZ’s comments:
This review took over 14 months to come to fruition, from original concept discussion, filming, editing, and finally publishing. I think it’s the funniest thing I’ve ever done. If it weren’t such a fringe subject to make a review about, I would totally submit it to tgwtg.com.
Transformation-Physical by ~Mythocraft on deviantART
I won’t be able to fully see it until I get home, but until I do, here’s my first advice : http://www.wallmart.com/ip/ORE-Furniture-Halogen-Tochiere-in-White/14579663
No hard feelings
Like or Dislike:
0 
2
jeeze.
It was just a friendly nudge toward the low lighting at the beginning and middle of the clip.
Lighten up will you.
Like or Dislike:
0 
1
An enjoyable review. There were some audio differences when you went from filming to voice over, but those are minor and can be worked out over time.
The major thing I take away from this review is being happy I live in the internet age, where I know that there are other people out there who are frustrated when someone skimps on their transformation sequence.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
It’s just you’ve been really snarky and negative lately, not just here but on DA as well. I worked really hard on this and it was the first review I’ve done in front of a camera. Then to come out and criticize the lighting as the first thing you say really feels like a slap in the face. I know the lighting is bad. I know the audio is of varied quality. And I know it took me way WAY too long to actually finish.
And yet I still put it up here for TF fans to enjoy because I felt like it would be of a positive benefit to the community.
Besides, I don’t have any money to buy a lamp. I barely have enough money to keep the site going.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
My comment about the audio wasn’t meant to be disparaging. I enjoyed the review, and look forward to more in the future.
I enjoyed the background on the history of the Shaggy Dog, as well as a comparison between the transformation method between the older movie and the current remake. The riffing was enjoyable, and the cut away skits were pretty good.
Thanks for all the hard work.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
lol i love u TZ you are just huralious like and i love this review hehe and i do agree this one was bad from the old one because we just been getting lazy now for Transformations in movies
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Wow. That really suck. The movie that is. I’m glad I wasn’t in an hurry to get it, nor do I plan to get it. I was planning to wait until it get into the 6$ bargain bin, but considering there’s not a single TF, I’ll pass.
Nice work on the review. Too bad you had to do it on a crappy movie though. They sure managed to ruin a classic though.
For your next one, may I suggest you try to get your hand on one of those cheap cell phone neck microphone? It probably help you with the live action commenting. Some were a bit difficult to understand. But in general, great review and I feel the same about the move as you do.
You would believe a remake would be better than a 40 years old movie and it’s 30 years old sequels. But nooo. 4 dragon taurs ‘thumbs’ down!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Yeah, because explaining the complexities of Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid in the form of a weaponised retrovirus is what should be used to explain the circumstance surrounding his infection as opposed to the much simpler and easier to understand for children (and the idiots that purchased this movie) “little angry dogs in ur bluud, durhur”, which clearly…doesnt…?
Anyway, once more for clarity.
“SUPER FUCKING ANIMAL TASEEEEERRRRRR!!!!”
Like or Dislike:
0 
0